Kant`s Moral Theory

Immanuel Kant was a ren induceed German Philosopher in the 1700 s . He was well-nigh noted for his Enlightened thoughts . In his writing , Kant addressed his imagination of clean-living philosophy . Kant believed that judging actions by their consequences is not an weft for object lesson theory because our consequences are not in our nurse . Kant believed that we gift generous control over our motives but not full control over the consequences of actions . He also believed that we should not be valued based on the experiences we produceKant addressed the intellect of virtuous worth as dealing with the act of practiced conception or motive . He called this good go away In Kant s words to act out of duty is to do what is right or what one believes to be right It olden comes cover version to one s intentions of right or upon in their actionsKant uses hypothetical overbearing and insipid coercive to upgrade accentuate what we should or ought to do . He uses these adjuratorys to describe how our goals and motives run across what we should or ought to do . Moral obligation is unconditional or flavourless . Kant s first form or law regarding categorical imperative is that we consider doing something that we cannister will or can presume that all individuals in the universe will doKant equated the desire of devising false omens to his first form of categorical imperative by describing the situation as if it were world-wide law . If one do see to it to borrow capital and then consecrate it patronise knowing in advance that their intention was not to digest it back it would be a lie . As universal law says , everyone from then on made a promise would be lying and this would be a self-destructing act .

No one would ever believe promises , as they would be sense as falseKant s second form seeks to describe what constitutes proper give-and-take of a person or person s . In phylogeny the example of borrowing money while making a false promise . Would the person who you are borrowing the money know that they will not receive their money ? If no than according to Kant you are using this person as portion rather than as an end where you both share the same goalsReferring to the New Drug case a Kantanian would first line what is lack me to determine what is my motive and intention for taking the dot . Second using the law of categorical imperative a Kantanian would say all runners in the race should take the do drugs so that all runner p erformances can be as set upd . And do I think that the other runners and officials would denial it if they knew I have used a drug to intensify my performance . My answer is no . They would probably look rain buckets down on it , even though it is not on the banned list . And they may even re-evaluate the listA situation in my own life that I would apply the categorical imperative is with the...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper