Friday, December 14, 2018
'The Cons of Marijuana Usage\r'
'The legalization of hemp is nonp beil of the around highly debated about subjects facing Ameri scum bags today. Advocates of legalization utilize two major arguments in their effort to make believe cannabis decriminalised. First, which is by utmost the biggest argument is that marihuana has a significant wellness check part. The second argument is that cannabis does non rush ill-treat to those that smoke it. Both of these arguments can be easily discounted by the many studies that w ar been do on the do of hemp both medicative and recreational.\r\nIn the following parag smashhs we will explore the tight details of marijuana that will discount the validity of the antecedently mentioned arguments as well as some greenness fallacies. I will focus first on the medical examination checkup fallacy. There currently exists a with child(p) debate concerning fume marijuana as a medicine. Many well-intentioned leaders and members of the public have been led misled b y the well-financed and organized pro- medicate legalization solicit into believing in that location is merit to their argument that ingest marijuana is a safe and resolutionive medicine.\r\nA review of the scientific research, expert medical testimony, and g overning agency findings shows this to be erroneous. There is no confession for using marijuana as a medicine. The move to legitimize smoking marijuana as a medicine is not encouraged by the national Food and Drug Administration, health and medical associations, or medical experts; however instead by groups such as the National Organization for the Reform of ganja Laws (NORML) and the Drug Policy Foundation (DPF). These organizations have weeny medical expertise and favor various forms of legalizing illicit do do drugsss.\r\nThe studies cited by the marijuana inspires have been found to be unscientific, poorly researched, and involved pharmaceutic tetrahydrocannabinol, not marijuana. An advocate that claimed he wa s an expert, testified at the 1987 federal hearings to reschedule marijuana, was in fact a wellness counselor at a health spa who admitted at a lower place lad to using every illegal mind-altering drug he ever studied. An early(a) ââ¬Å"expertââ¬Â admitted he had not kept up with natural medical or scientific information on marijuana for over 18 age.\r\nAnother doctor claimed there was voluminous medical research on the authority of marijuana but below oath, when asked to cite the military issue of the studies, he replied, ââ¬Å"I would doubt very few. ââ¬Â The fact is that there is not one reliable scientific study that shows smoking marijuana to be a safe and effective drug. The majority of the marijuana advocatesââ¬â¢ ââ¬Å" turn outââ¬Â comes from unscientific, non-scrutinized or analyzed anecdotal statements from slew with a variety of illnesses. It is incomprehensible whether these individuals riding habit marijuana front to their illness or ar usi ng marijuana in combination with other medicines.\r\nIt is alike unknown whether they have had recent medical examinations, argon justifying their use of marijuana, experiencing a placebo effect, or experiencing the intoxicating effect of smoking marijuana. The main psychoactive ingredient in marijuana (tetrahydrocannabinol) is already legally open in pharmaceutical capsule form by prescription from medical doctors. This drug, Marinol, is less often prescribed because of the potential unseemly effects, and there are more effective new medicines currently available.\r\nMarinol differs from the crude plant marijuana because it consists of one pure, well-studied, FDA-approved pharmaceutical in stable known dosages. marihuana is an unstable mixture of over 400 chemicals including umteen toxic psychoactive chemicals, which are largely unstudied and appear in uncontrolled fortes. The manufacturers of Marinol, Roxane Laboratories Incorporated, do not agree with the pro-marijuana advoca tes that THC is safe and harmless. In the atomic number 101ââ¬â¢s Desk Reference, a good portion of the exposition of Marinol takes warnings about the adverse effects.\r\nSeriously, doesn t park good sense dictate that it is not good medical furthermoste to allow a substance to be used as a medicine if that product is ingested by smoking, not FDA-approved, made up of hundreds of different chemicals, and self-prescribed and administered by the patient. The federal government, over the last 20 years involving a number of administrations from both political developies, has goaded that smoking marijuana has no redeeming medicinal value, and is in fact harmful to health. These govern kind agencies include the Drug Enforcement Administration, the Food and Drug Administration, and the U. S. Public health Service.\r\nTheir latest finding, as recently as 1994, was corroborate in a decision by the U. S. solicit of Appeals in Washington, DC Since the pro-marijuana lobby has been unsuccessful in dealing with the federal government, they have targeted state and local governments to legitimize smoking marijuana as a medicine. A careful examination of their legislative and/or ballot proposals reveals they are written to effectively sabotage the enforcement of most marijuana rightfulnesss. Crude, intoxicating marijuana under their proposals would be easier to obtain and use than even the most harmless, low-level prescription drug.\r\nMajor medical and health organizations, as well as the vast majority of nationally recognized expert medical doctors, scientists and researchers, have not accepted smoking marijuana as a safe and effective medicine. These organizations include: the American Medical Association, the American Cancer Society, National induration Association, the American Glaucoma Association, American Academy of Ophthalmology, National inwardness build, National Cancer Institute, National Institute for neurologic Disorders and Stroke, National I nstitute of Dental Research, and the National Institute on Allergy and Infectious Diseases.\r\nThere are thousands of studies available documenting the harmful physical and psychological effects of smoking marijuana. The harmful consequences include but are not limited to premature cancer, addiction, coordination and perception impairment, a number of mental disorders including depression, hostility and emergenced aggressiveness, world(a) apathy, memory loss, reproductive disabilities, impairment to the immune system, numerous airway injuries, and other general problems associated with intoxication.\r\nSo far I have shown why marijuana should be disregarded as medicinal now I intend to discount some more common fallacies that marijuana advocates like to throw around as well as the argument that marijuana causes no harm to the smoker. First, advocates for marijuana like to say laws against inebriant and drugs mount t work so why have them. They often use prohibition era in the e arly 1900 s as an example. Even though prohibition was unpopular and only in effect for about fourteen years, it did impact the use of alcoholic beverage.\r\n alcohol use, alcohol-related deaths, and admissions to hospitals for other alcohol related illnesses were all cut back approximately 50 percent. Also, contrary to what you hear, thereââ¬â¢s no evidence of a big profit in crime. That probably makes for good gangster movies, but wee else. Prohibition was rescinded because alcohol historically had been part of our lives, and the majority didn t support prohibition. Drugs, on the other hand, have not been part of our everyday lives, and over 80 percent of Americans favor drug prohibition\r\nA second fallacy is that legalizing marijuana would get the number of crimes and would free up prison topographic point for more violent offenders. First of all there are 12 million arrests made every year out of which 1 million are for drug violations, of these only 12 percent are sen tenced to prison. closely of the criminals that are locked up already have rap sheets a mile long for different crimes anyways. directly if we legalize marijuana the arrests would stop because of the intensify in the criminal code but the criminals wouldn t change their behavior and become law-abiding citizens.\r\nThey will pass to commit crimes to pay rent, obtain cars, go to concerts, buy clothes, eat, and buy legal drugs. Thirdly, most advocates like to use the Netherlands as an example of marijuana universe legalized and not having any problems. The Netherlands has begun experiencing a variety of problems including a farm in crime, welfare, unemployment, and addicts from other countries migrating there to indulge their drug appetites. A fourth common fallacy is that if we legalize marijuana we would save at least 20 billion dollars annually that is now used towards law enforcement.\r\nWhat this fallacy assumes is that there would be no governmental costs associated with d istribution, regulation, and control of legal drugs. Using alcohol as a model, we know these costs can be substantial. Knowing government, there is very little they do that is cost effective. In 1965, when we started Medicare, Congress intercommunicate that it would cost this country $12 billion by 1990. The actual costs that year were $110 billion. In 1968 food stamps cost $173 million annually, and now, less than 30 years later, the price tag is $24 billion. And, in the end the greatest fallacy that marijuana does not harm the drug user.\r\nThe fact remains that marijuana and hashish are intoxicating substances that make the user high. The degree of mental and physical impairment depends on the amount and strength of marijuana smoked. There is a substantial balance between the 2 to 5 percent THC weed of the ââ¬â¢70s and the 10 to 20 percent THC in todayââ¬â¢s weed. There is a definite reason why the higher spirit level is more desirable and expensive, and thatââ¬â¢s simply because it gives the user a more powerful high. Studies show marijuana can and often does cause apathy, diminishes mental capacity, causes difficultness in concentrating, decline in performance, and lost motivation.\r\nThousands of studies also show marijuana use adversely affects the brain, sound reflection process, immune system, respiratory system, cardiovascular system, and remains in the body for extended periods of time. In addition, marijuana use often impairs normal thought processes, distorts reality, reduces self-control, and releases inhibitions, all of which increase the chance of harmful and criminal behavior. Many times the user is unaware he or she is being affected unless told by others. A Stanford Medical inculcate study showed pilots to be impaired 24 hours later on smoking one joint, even though they mat up they were functioning normally.\r\nIn conclusion, the bottom line is, whenever persons are under the influence, they pose a threat to themselves a nd others. We donââ¬â¢t need more intoxicated people on our streets, at public events, or tearaway(a) on our highways. Traffic fatality studies clearly butt against a disproportionate number of deaths caused by drivers under the influence of marijuana. Why would we want to make a substance like that legal, inexpensive and readily available to satisfy he desires of a few who already choose to violate our laws? Havenââ¬â¢t the advocates wise(p) anything from our experience with drunkenness?\r\n'
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment